Big Companies Also Make Software Mistakes
In this article
Big Companies Also Make Software Mistakes
A few days back, I was reading about the Claude Code CLI source code leak.
The surprising part was not only the incident itself. The surprising part was the thought that came after reading it:
How can such a large AI company make such a basic packaging mistake?
But then I paused.
And honestly, the answer is simple.
Because software is not built by company size.
Software is built by people, process, clarity, testing, pressure, deadlines, assumptions and small decisions taken every day.
And wherever people are involved, mistakes are possible.
Big Names Also Miss Small Things
We use Zoho Workplace in our company.
Once, we faced an issue where search was not working properly across email and Cliq. Search is not some luxury feature. In a workplace platform, it is one of the most basic expectations.
We contacted support. Their executive came, checked the issue properly, analysed it and helped us fix it.
Now, Zoho is one of India’s respected technology companies. They have mature products, large teams and strong systems.
Still, a basic issue reached the customer.
Does that mean Zoho is a bad company?
No.
It only means software is complex. Even good companies can miss things.
We have seen similar situations in large public digital platforms also. GST portal, income tax portal and other government technology systems have had technical glitches reported publicly in the past.
The point is not to blame any company, vendor or department.
The point is to understand reality.
If large companies, with large teams and large budgets, can still face software issues, then we should stop assuming that small IT companies are automatically immature just because one bug appears.
A Bug Is Not Always a Quality Certificate
Many customers think like this:
- If a small company has a bug, they are inexperienced.
- If a big company has a bug, it is a temporary issue.
This is where the mindset needs correction.
A bug does not always prove poor quality.
Sometimes it proves that the software has reached a real-world condition that testing did not fully cover. Sometimes it is a missed case. Sometimes it is a process gap. Sometimes it is human error. And yes, sometimes it can also be carelessness.
All bugs are not equal.
There is a difference between:
- a bug caused by an honest human miss,
- a bug caused by weak process,
- a bug caused by careless attitude,
- a bug caused by poor testing,
- and a bug caused by unethical shortcuts.
A mature customer should not judge a software company only by the existence of bugs.
They should judge by the response.
The Real Test Is Response
When an issue appears, what does the company do?
- Do they accept it?
- Do they investigate properly?
- Do they communicate honestly?
- Do they fix it quickly?
- Do they improve the process so the same issue does not repeat?
This is where professionalism becomes visible.
In my experience, customers do not lose trust only because of bugs. They lose trust when the company hides, delays, ignores, blames the user or gives confusing answers.
A responsible company may still make mistakes.
But it does not run away from them.
Small Company Does Not Mean Small Thinking
Many business owners feel safer with big names. That is understandable.
A large brand gives confidence. It shows stability, scale and reputation.
But company size is not the full truth.
- A small company can be immature, yes.
- But a big company can also miss important things.
- A small company can write poor code.
- But a big company can also ship bugs.
- A small company can miss testing.
- But a big company can also miss packaging checks, portal load handling or basic user experience details.
So the real question is not:
“How big is the company?”
The better question is:
“How does this company think?”
- Do they understand my business?
- Do they ask the right questions?
- Do they simplify before building?
- Do they care about maintainability?
- Do they protect data?
- Do they accept mistakes honestly?
- Do they improve after every issue?
These questions reveal more than office size or team size.
Software Is Thinking Converted Into a System
This is one thing I strongly believe.
Software is not only code.
Software is thinking converted into a working system.
If the thinking is unclear, the software will become confusing.
If the process is weak, the software will become unstable.
If communication is careless, even a small bug can become a big trust issue.
And if the thinking is clear, even a small team can build meaningful software.
That does not mean small teams are always better.
It only means good software comes from clarity, responsibility and care — not from company size alone.
Bugs Are Not the Final Test
As a software developer and business owner, I cannot honestly say that we will never make mistakes.
That would be a fake claim.
We are humans. We may miss things. Some bugs may appear only after real usage. Some improvements become visible only after customers start using the system in their own way.
But what matters is intention and response.
- We should not hide behind excuses.
- We should not treat users as fools.
- We should not ignore real problems.
Every bug is not only a technical issue. It is feedback from reality.
And when handled properly, it improves the product, the process and the trust.
The next time you see a bug in software, do not immediately ask only one question:
“How can this happen?”
Ask a better question:
“How is the company responding to it?”
Because in software, perfection is rare.
But responsibility is possible.
And trust is not built by being bug-free once.
Trust is built by being responsible every time.
If this made you think about your own software decisions, share your thoughts. What do you trust more — company size, brand name, or the way a company responds when something goes wrong?
Chirag Gadara
System Thinker & Technopreneur
With over 18 years of experience across technology, automation, and enterprise systems, I help businesses eliminate bottlenecks and engineer simplicity for sustainable growth.